The Appellate Division Second Department decided a complex appeal involving cross motions on whether a property owner had sufficiently stated causes of action sounding in violations of constitutional rights under 42 USC 1983 and related causes of action resulting from the denial of a certificate of use. In the case…
Articles Posted in Zoning and Land Use Law
Summer 2009 Zoning and Municipal Law Round Up
The following is a summary of New York zoning and municipal law cases decided since June that we have not yet covered. The summary has been prepared by Bernis Shapiro of our office. In the Matter of Lackawanna Community Development Corporation v. Frank E. Karkowski et al, 12 NY3d 578,…
Town May Prohibit Use of Land Solely for Access to Abutting Parcel
The Appellate Division held that a town could prohibit a proposed road over property zoned for commercial and single family use when the road was intended solely to serve a multi-family use on an abutting parcel. In Matter of BBJ Associates LLC v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town…
Courts Continue to Defer to Zoning Boards
In another in a long line of cases, last week the Appellate Division again deferred to the decision of a zoning board which had denied an area variance. In DiPaolo v Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town//Village of Harrison, the court found the zoning board had engaged in the…
Appellate Court Discounts Procedural Missteps by Planning Board in Granting Site Plan Approval
In a case involving a challenge to site plan approval for a Wal-Mart, the Appellate Division Fourth Department found a number of challenges to procedural/technical oversights by the planning board to be insufficient to cause the court to overturn the approval. In Matter of Residents Against Wal-Mart v. Planning Board…
Denial of A Permit Cannot Be Based Upon Community Pressure Rather Than Expert Opinion
A court reversed the denial of a wetlands permit based upon the conclusion that the Town Board “succumbed to community pressure.” In Matter of Moy v. Board of Trustees of Town of Southhold, the Appellate Division, Second Department, found the Town Board relied upon various reports and recommendations which were…
Acquiescence to Nonconforming Use Does not Render It Legal
The Appellate Division Second Department upheld the determination of a zoning board finding that maintaining a “hospice” for terminally ill animals in a home over a period of years was neither a customary accessory use nor a legal non-conforming use. In Matter of Marino v. Town of Smithtown, the court…
Vacancy Rate Is An Appropriate Criteria In Determining To Issue A Use Variance
In Matter of O’Connell Machinery Co., Inc v. City of Buffalo Zoning Board of Appeals, the court affirmed the granting of a use variance based upon the high vacancy rate of the property. The Appellate Division Fourth Department found that the property zoned light industrial was properly granted a variance…
No Vested Rights In Nonconforming Sand and Gravel Mine
In a Fourth Department case we think is worthy of noting, but missed earlier, the Plaintiff claimed that the operation of a sand and gravel mining operation on its 216 acre property was a legal non-conforming use to which it had a vest right. The Appellate Division, in Matter of…
Court Upholds Finding That Wind Powered Generators are a Utility
In the emerging area of wind power the Appellate Division upheld the decision of a local zoning board that wind powered generators are a utility. In Matter of Wind Power Ethics Group v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Cape Vincent, the Court found that the interpretation that…