- N.Y. Court of Appeals Broadens Test For Vested Right to Non-Conforming Use
- Seventh Circuit Decides Two Substantial Burden Claims Under RLUIPA
- Determination to Deny Area Variance Does Not Require Justification in Each of the Five Statutory Factors
- Reassessment of Single Property that is Otherwise Unchanged is Illegal
- Appellate Division Determines Village May Not Discontinue Streets Unless Useless and There Has Been SEQRA Compliance
- Court of Appeals Upholds Release of Documents Under FOIL Despite Claim of Exemption
- Court Throws Out Condemnation for Columbia University Campus
- New York Court of Appeals Upholds "Atlantic Yards" Condemnation
- Property Owner Who Successfully Challenges Finding of Public Purpose for Condemnation May Recover Attorney's Fees and Costs
- New York Court of Appeals Finds Zoning Board Abused Its Discretion in Granting Use Variance
- New York Court of Appeals Expands Criteria for Standing to Bring a SEQRA Challenge
- Failure to Exhaust Adminstrative Remedies Bars Claim for Certificate of Occupancy
- Deceitful Conduct May be a Basis for Denial of an Area Variance
- Court Allows Some Causes of Action Under 42 USC 1983 to Stand Against the Village of Suffern
- Summer 2009 Zoning and Municipal Law Round Up
- Property Owner Entitled to Repairs When Pre-Acquisition Emergency Access Is Granted During EDPL Process
- Town May Prohibit Use of Land Solely for Access to Abutting Parcel
- Rochester Curfew Law Unconstitutional
- Courts Continue to Defer to Zoning Boards
- Appellate Court Discounts Procedural Missteps by Planning Board in Granting Site Plan Approval
- Denial of A Permit Cannot Be Based Upon Community Pressure Rather Than Expert Opinion
- Acquiescence to Nonconforming Use Does not Render It Legal
- Town May Purchase Property for Town Hall Which Exceeds Present Needs
- Vacancy Rate Is An Appropriate Criteria In Determining To Issue A Use Variance
- No Vested Rights In Nonconforming Sand and Gravel Mine
- The Lead Agency Has Discretion to Require A Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement
- Road Improvement Serving Primarily Commercial Vehicles Does not Defeat Eminent Domain
- Sale of Municipal Property with a Purchase Money Mortgage is Not an Illegal Gift or Loan
- Authority of Municipalities to Disclose Verizon’s Quarterly Franchise Reports to Cablevision Pursuant to FOIL
- City's Extension of Credit to Purchase Ferry Service Was Not Illegal
- Court Upholds Finding That Wind Powered Generators are a Utility
- Court Voids Denial of Permit Renewal For Failure to Adhere to Administrative Precedent
- Court Upholds Denial of Area Variance Due to Self Created Hardship
- Oral Agreement With Mayor Is Not Binding On Village
- Court Holds Challenges to Zoning Amendments Do Not Alway Have to Be Brought Within Four Months
- New York Court Upholds SEQRA Findings Related to Climate Change
- Property Owners Within the Modified Zoning District Have Standing to Challenge Amendment
- Zoning Board Determination of Preexisiting Nonconfroming Use Upheld
- Atlantic Yards Condemnation Litigation Continues
- Challenge to a Local Law Requiring Discontinuance of a Nonconforming Use
- Appellate Court Summarizes Rules for Area Variances
- Zoning Board’s Quasi-Judicial Administrative Decision is Subject to Res Judicata Dismissal
- Town Zoning Ordinance Voided
- Court Reiterates Authority of Zoning Board to Interpret Local Zoning Code
- SEQRA Does Not Preclude a Revote on a Findings Statement
- Planning Board May Require Recreation Fee at Time of Final Subdivision Approval
- An Invalid Permit Cannot Confer Vested Rights
- Legislature Modifies the Rules Governing Adverse Possession
- New York Legislature Clarifies Availability of Electronic Media Through FOIL
- Variance May Not Be Conditioned Upon Term of Ownership of Current Owner
- Court Holds Communications from Consultant Not Exempt from FOIL
- Zoning Variance May Not Be Limited To The Term of Ownership of the Applicant
- A Complete Record is the Key in Zoning Board Applications
- Allowing Hot Mix Asphalt Plant as Special Use is Not Spot Zoning
- Belated March Madness-SEQRA and Zoning Cases from March, 2008
- Municipal Home Rule Permits Creation of Position of Police Commissioner
- When Is a Water District Not a Municipality?
- A SEQRA Review Is Not Required To Deny An Application
- Article by Silverberg Featured in New York Real Estate Law Reporter
- Conditions on Zoning Variance Must Be Reasonable
- Courts Must Apply a Zoning Law as Amended Following Submission of an Application
- Court Reverses Determination that Rezoning Constituted an Unconstitutional Taking
- Court Rules Municipal Annexation Requires Special Election
- Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Challenge to “Atlantic Yards” Condemnation
- Westchester Creates New Municipal Planning Tool
- Village Settles RLUIPA Case With Westchester Day School
- Civil Rights Action Barred When Article 78 Proceeding Provides Adequate Remedy
- Agency Has the Burden of Proving Exemption for FOIL Request
- Denial of Area Variance Due to Community Pressure Reversed
- Steven Silverberg Interviewed Concerning RLUIPA
- Site Plan Application Annulled Due to Prejudging By Planning Board Members
- City Attorney May Extend Time to Act Under Variance Without Zoning Board Action
- Open Space Restriction on Subdivision Plat Binds Future Property Owners
- Second Circuit Rules RLUIPA Applies to Westchester Day School
- Resolution Approving Consideration of Cluster Development Is Not Subject to Challenge
- Local Law Annulled Due to Improper Segmentation of SEQRA Review
- Appellate Court Holds Adjoining Municipalities May Sue Under SEQRA To Protect Community Character
- Thirty Year Old Site Plan Approval Does Not Create Vested Rights
- Appellate Court Rules Use of Eminent Domain Improper
- Second Circuit Rejects Section 1983 Property Rights Claim
- Court of Appeals Interprets New York City Watershed Regulations
- Court Denies Application to File Late Notice of Claim
- Condemnation for Recreational Proposes Qualifies as a Public Use
- Zoning Board Bound by Precedent Unless It States a Reason for a Different Result
- Court Rules Demolition Permit Does Not Trigger SEQRA Review
- Court Finds Long Beach New York Ordinance Unconstitutionally Vague
- Court Establishes Statute of Limitations for Challenge to Municipal Review Fees
- Federal Court Finds Village Discriminated Against Day Laborers
- Portions of Albany Zoning Ordinance Excluding Schools from Commercial Zone Held Unconstitutional
- New York Legislature Provides for Training of Planning Board and Zoning Board Members
- Court Finds Vested Rights in 1993 Building Permit
- Subdivision Application Not Complete Until Filing of Either a SEQRA Negative Declaration or a Notice of Completion of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement
- Court Holds Planning Board Authority to Delegate SEQRA Review Responsibilities is Limited
- Legislature Provides for Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) Requests by E-Mail
- Court Holds Challenge To Zoning Law Must Be Brought Within Four Months of Adoption-Sometimes
- Court Finds Substantial Compliance Sufficient to Uphold Petition to Establish Water District
- Local Law Must Be Challenged Within Four Months Where Action Could Have Been Brought as Article 78 Proceeding
- Court Rules Adverse Possessor’s Actual Knowledge of True Owner Does Not Preclude Successful Adverse Possession Claim
- Court Declines to Apply RLUIPA But Upholds Religious Organization’s Use of Lot Zoned for Conference and Training Facilities
- Court May Not Compel Town Board To Consider Zone Change Application
- Court Upholds New York City’s Use of Eminent Domain for Hudson Yards Project
- ZONING BOARD MAY DENY VARIANCE DESPITE PRIOR APPROVAL OF SIMILAR RELIEF
- COURT FINDS DEIS AMENDMENT VIOLATED SEQRA
- Silverberg Zalantis LLP Successful in Defending SEQRA Determination
- Municipality Liable Under Contract for Construction Work
- Zoning Board May Not Use Public Safety As Sole Basis for Interpretation
- Changed Circumstances Warrant Area Variance Rehearing Before Zoning Board
- Court Finds New York City Towing Regulations Unconstitutional
- Court of Appeals Bars Attempt to Block Eminent Domain Action
- Mamaroneck to Appeal RLUIPA Decision
- Freedom of Information Law Continues to be an Issue in New York
- Court Rejects SEQRA Negative Declararion
- Summary of Westchester Day School RLUIPA Decision
- RLUIPA Applied in Westchester Day School Case
- New Impact Statement Requirements Go Into Effect This Week
- Court of Appeals Invalidates New York City Equal Benefits Law
- New Notice Requirements Under General Municipal Law
- What Will the Eminent Domain Law Look Like in New York?
- Property Rights Case Sent Back to District Court for Further Action
- Second Circuit Reverses Judgment for Denial of Wireless Telecommunications Tower
- Village of Suffern Sued Under RLUIPA
- Appellate Division Decides Trilogy of New Rochelle Zoning Challenges
- Court of Appeals Remands Adult Zoning Case
- Eminent Domain Case Remanded to District Court on Notice Issue
- Jury Awards 1.6 Million for Rezoning of Property
- When Does RLUIPA Prevent Review of Land Use Applications?
- Bar Association Creates Task Force to Study Eminent Domain
- New York Law Requires Posting Environmental Impact Statements on the WEB
- New York Court Holds Meeting By Telephone Violates Law
Subscribe 
Archives
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- April 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
Search
Our Other Blogs
Recent Posts
-
February 18, 2010 10:36 AM
N.Y. Court of Appeals Broadens Test For Vested Right to Non-Conforming Use -
January 1, 2010 10:58 AM
Seventh Circuit Decides Two Substantial Burden Claims Under RLUIPA -
December 25, 2009 1:42 PM
Determination to Deny Area Variance Does Not Require Justification in Each of the Five Statutory Factors -
December 18, 2009 10:24 AM
Reassessment of Single Property that is Otherwise Unchanged is Illegal -
December 17, 2009 1:53 PM
Appellate Division Determines Village May Not Discontinue Streets Unless Useless and There Has Been SEQRA Compliance -
December 15, 2009 11:14 AM
Court of Appeals Upholds Release of Documents Under FOIL Despite Claim of Exemption -
December 4, 2009 3:39 PM
Court Throws Out Condemnation for Columbia University Campus -
November 29, 2009 8:23 AM
New York Court of Appeals Upholds "Atlantic Yards" Condemnation -
November 22, 2009 5:02 PM
Property Owner Who Successfully Challenges Finding of Public Purpose for Condemnation May Recover Attorney's Fees and Costs -
November 22, 2009 4:06 PM
New York Court of Appeals Finds Zoning Board Abused Its Discretion in Granting Use Variance
Legal Blogs
- Justia Law Review (Ken Chan & Tim Stanley)
- New York Injury Lawyers Blog (Gallivan & Gallivan)
- Burn Injury Resource Center (Kramer & Pollack)
- Climate Change Attorney Blog (Silverberg Zalantis)
- Texas Injury Law Blog (Yanta Law Firm)
- New York Car Accident Lawyer Blog (Stephen Bilkis)
- Long Term Disability Law Blog (Scott Riemer)
- ERISA Lawyer Blog (Stanley Baum)
- Construction Litigation Law Blog (Stark & Stark)
- Hoboken Law Blog (Frank Marciano)
- beSpacific (Sabrina Pacifici)
- Employment Lawyer Blog (Joseph, Herzfeld, Hester & Kirschenbaum)
- Dennis Kennedy Blog (Dennis Kennedy)
- New Jersey Family Law Blog (Rotolo Law Firm)
ABA Journal Daily News
- Firm That Made Job Offer to Presiding Judge Not Liable for Damages A New Jersey Appellate Division judge dismissed legal malpractice and deprivation of due process counts against a firm who offered a job to a judge before he ruled in which the firm was the prevailing ....
- Nine Real Estate Lawyers Leave Pillsbury for Goulston Five partners, including the managing partner of Pillsbury Winthrop's Washington, D.C., office, are moving to the local office of Goulston & Storrs. It was"such a good opportunity we couldn’ ....
- Vaccine Court Finds No Thimerosal-Autism LInk A special branch of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ruled today that the vaccine additive thimerosal is not to blame for autism. Today's rulings in three test cases that thimerosal alone does not cau ....
- Paper Explores Why Pa. Lawyers Allowed to Practice After Conviction John Karoly, a solo from Allentown, Pa., pleaded guilty to federal tax evasion charges last July and was convicted of money laundering last November. Yet Karoly is still practicing law—a week ag ....
- Phil Spector Appeals Murder Rap, Citing Error, Misconduct Lawyers for Phil Spector, who was convicted and sentenced to 19 years to life for the second-degree murder of actress Lana Clarkson, asked the California Second District Court of Appeal this week to r ....
- Republicans Criticize AG Holder’s Failure to Disclose Terrorism Briefs The Justice Department has confirmed that Attorney General Eric Holder failed to disclose during the confirmation process his work on amicus briefs in terrorism cases. The briefs opposed President Bus ....